Engineers want to build things right. That includes making systems secure. But security evokes mixed feelings in most product teams, and for understandable reasons.
The problem with unlimited security
Knowing where to stop with security is genuinely hard. You can always find something to make you more secure, and having real confidence that the fixes you are applying are actually reducing risk is not always clear. Resources are limited. Engineers are there to build good software and drive business growth. They do not have the time or training to discover, risk-assess and fix every security vulnerability in a cloud environment and application stack.
A threat model addresses all of this. It provides a framework for discovery, risk assessment and remediation, and it captures security knowledge in one place. This enables planned, deliberate implementation of controls rather than reactive just-in-time fixes that create technical debt and stress the team.
Business risk as the anchor
Our approach to threat modelling puts business risk first. That makes it accessible to everyone regardless of their technical background.
Putting business risk at the centre serves two purposes.
First, it lets engineering and security teams show the business how security work connects to outcomes. Security becomes something with a clear value, not just a cost centre.
Second, it stops limited engineering and security resource being spent mitigating low-risk threats. That resource can instead go towards reducing the business risks that actually matter.
Better collaboration across teams
In larger organisations, teams often end up siloed. Different groups are working on different parts of the technology estate, often without visibility of each other's security risks or mitigations. Managing that is hard for a central security team.
Threat modelling gives a full risk overview across the technology estate. It makes it straightforward to see the level of risk at both a detailed and an organisational level. It supports a more cooperative approach to risk ownership, where teams can take responsibility for their part of the picture with a shared understanding of how it all fits together.
The practical effect I have seen in organisations is a real transformation in the conversation between engineering and security. More clarity, faster decision-making, better products and a measurably stronger security posture.
Jonny founded Threatplane in 2017. With a background in offensive security, he has spent 15+ years helping organisations across defence, financial services, healthcare, and manufacturing understand and manage their technology risks.
Full bio →