Skip to main content

Bespoke Technology Risk Scorecard

Can your current security programme understand what you’ve built?

See whether your custom applications are creating business risk that scanners, dashboards, and compliance checklists may be missing.
Start the assessment

~10 min · no login required

Most security tools are good at finding technical issues. They are much weaker at explaining what those issues mean for your revenue, operations, reputation, and compliance exposure — especially when your business depends on custom-built systems.

Built for

Technology and security leaders responsible for custom applications.

Technology leaders with bespoke platforms, portals, integrations, or internal systems.

Organisations where a breach or outage of custom software would affect revenue, operations, customers, or regulatory exposure.

Not built for

Organisations that run entirely on commodity SaaS and do not build or operate custom technology.

What we measure

The assessment walks through five areas in about ten minutes and ends with a single board-ready result.

01 // Bespoke Technology Dependency

Custom-built systems increasingly run the parts of the business that actually make money — revenue, service delivery, and customer experience.

When they aren’t treated as board-level risk assets, decisions about them get made too far down the organisation, and the real exposure never reaches the people accountable for it.

02 // Architectural and Supply Chain Visibility

Your critical systems rest on architectures, trust boundaries, and suppliers that very few people can fully map.

When that picture is incomplete, a supplier’s incident or one weak connection can become your outage — with no warning and no clear owner.

03 // Business Risk Translation

Security teams produce technical findings; the business runs on revenue, reputation, operations, and compliance.

When findings aren’t translated into those terms, leadership can’t see which issues actually threaten the business, and effort drifts toward noise.

04 // Prioritisation and Decision-Making

Scanners and tools surface far more findings than any team could ever act on.

When priority follows tool severity instead of business impact, teams stay busy fixing what’s loudest while the risks that matter most go untouched.

05 // Assurance, Risk Register and Board Readiness

Boards, auditors, and regulators increasingly expect cyber risk to show up in the corporate risk register.

When that register isn’t fed by live risk data, leadership ends up governing from a version of reality that security and engineering wouldn’t recognise.

Start the assessment